PassSprint

One rule, 2 ways the exam asks it. Same knowledge point, different phrasing — work through all of them, because the exam rarely reuses the wording.

State RegulationsTX specificDifficulty 3/5

A Texas insurer charges two applicants of the same age, health class and occupation different premiums for the same life policy solely because they live in different counties. Under TIC 544.002, how is this evaluated?

Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.

Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)

Why B is correct

Under TIC 544.002, unfair discrimination means applying different rates, benefits or terms to insureds of the same class and essentially the same hazard, unless the difference is based on sound actuarial principles, actual experience, or a reasonable classification. Related prohibitions appear in TIC 1702.103 and TIC 1702.153. Geography can be a valid rating factor, but only with actuarial support; a purely arbitrary distinction is unfair discrimination whether or not the rate was filed and whether or not anyone complains.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A) Geographic rating is permitted only where it rests on sound actuarial principles, not automatically.
  • C) Unfair discrimination is judged by the rate structure itself, not by whether a complaint was filed before delivery.
  • D) Filing a rate with TDI does not authorize distinctions that lack actuarial or experience support.

Memory hook

Same class, same hazard, different price — that is unfair discrimination unless the data backs it up.

State RegulationsTX specificDifficulty 3/5

A Texas insurer charges two applicants of the same age, sex and health class different premiums for the same individual life policy. Under TIC 544.002, when is such a rate difference permitted?

Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.

Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)

Why B is correct

TIC 544.002 prohibits unfair discrimination between insureds who are in the same class and represent essentially the same hazard, but it does not require identical rates. A difference is allowed when it is based on sound actuarial principles or on actual or reasonably anticipated experience. A marketing preference, the group-versus-individual setting or a flat rule that everyone pays the same all miss the point: the test is whether the classification is actuarially supported.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A) Internal marketing approval is not an actuarial basis for charging different rates.
  • C) The actuarial exception is not confined to single-employer group business.
  • D) The statute bars unfair discrimination, not every difference that is actuarially justified.

Memory hook

Same class, same hazard: differ only on actuarial grounds.

Related Practice Questions