State RegulationsTN specificDifficulty 3/5
Which statement most accurately distinguishes the hearing stage from judicial review under Tennessee insurance law?
Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.
Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)
Why D is correct
Under T.C.A. § 56-6-112, the sequence runs in one direction. The hearing is the department's own proceeding: evidence goes before the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Commerce & Insurance, who then enters an order. Judicial review is the court proceeding that follows, in which a judge examines that order. Confusing the two stages is a classic trap because both involve deciding facts and applying the insurance law, but they belong to different decision makers.
Why the other options are wrong
- A) The administrative hearing comes first; judicial review examines the order that results from it, not the reverse.
- B) The stages are distinct proceedings before different decision makers — the Commissioner administratively, the courts on review.
- C) The department conducts its own hearings; the courts' role begins only with judicial review of the final order.
Memory hook
Commissioner decides, court reviews: two doors, walked in order.