State RegulationsPA specificDifficulty 3/5
Which statement most accurately distinguishes the administrative cease-and-desist process from criminal enforcement under Pennsylvania insurance law?
Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.
Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)
Why C is correct
Pennsylvania runs two parallel tracks. The administrative track — hearings and cease-and-desist orders before the Pennsylvania Insurance Department under 40 P.S. § 310.91 and 40 P.S. § 1171.9 — addresses regulatory violations and can end in civil penalties and license discipline. Separately, knowing violations of the insurance laws can be pursued criminally in the courts. The tracks differ in forum, burden, and consequence, and neither replaces the other.
Why the other options are wrong
- A) The order of operations is reversed: the administrative process does not wait for, and does not require, a criminal conviction.
- B) Cease-and-desist enforcement is a Pennsylvania administrative function; it is not handed to federal prosecutors.
- D) The department's hearings are administrative proceedings; no jury sits in them.
Memory hook
Department hears, courts prosecute — two doors, two burdens.