State RegulationsMI specificDifficulty 2/5
A Lansing producer tells a prospect that, because the Michigan Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association backs every policy, the policy she is selling carries no risk of loss if the insurer fails. How should this statement be classified?
Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.
Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)
Why C is correct
M.C.L. 500.2005(i) makes it an unfair trade practice to misrepresent the terms, benefits, or coverage provided by the Michigan Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association. Guaranty-association coverage exists by law, but Michigan prohibits using it to imply that a policy is endorsed by the state or free of insolvency risk. A producer who paints guaranty coverage as a complete safety net has misrepresented material facts, and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) can impose cease-and-desist remedies and monetary penalties for the violation.
Why the other options are wrong
- A) Guaranty coverage does exist, but the law forbids using it to suggest that a policy eliminates or minimizes the risk of insurer insolvency.
- B) Putting the statement in writing does not cure a misrepresentation; the content, not the format, is what violates M.C.L. 500.2005(i).
- D) The financial strength of the issuing insurer is irrelevant; describing guaranty coverage as removing risk is misleading regardless of the insurer's condition.
Memory hook
Never sell the guaranty fund as a risk-free safety net.