PassSprint

One rule, 2 ways the exam asks it. Same knowledge point, different phrasing — work through all of them, because the exam rarely reuses the wording.

State RegulationsGA specificDifficulty 2/5

A producer repeatedly persuades a client to finance purchases of new policies from the cash values of the client's existing policies, all issued by the same insurer, generating a commission for the producer each time. In Georgia, this practice is best described as:

Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.

Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)

Why A is correct

Under Georgia's unfair trade practices framework (O.C.G.A. § 33-6-4), churning is the practice of using the cash values of existing policies to finance repeated purchases of new coverage from the same insurer, generating successive commissions for the producer. It is distinguished from twisting, which under § 33-6-4(b)(2) requires a misrepresentation inducing the policyholder to lapse, forfeit, or surrender a policy.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B) Twisting requires a misrepresentation inducing a lapse, forfeiture, or surrender; not every replacement involving the same insurer qualifies.
  • C) Rebating concerns giving or accepting valuable consideration outside the contract, not financing new coverage with existing cash values.
  • D) Regulators treat this pattern as abusive churning precisely because of the repeated commissions, so it is far from regulation-free.

Memory hook

Same insurer, cash-value carousel = churning.

State RegulationsGA specificDifficulty 1/5

Which practice is best described as churning?

Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.

Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)

Why D is correct

Churning is the practice of financing additional coverage from the same insurer using the cash values of existing policies, often through repeated financed purchases that strip the original policy. Georgia law reaches the surrounding conduct — misrepresentation to induce surrender or lapse — through O.C.G.A. § 33-6-4(b)(2), and the Georgia Insurance Department treats same-insurer cash-value abuse as churning.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A) Inducing surrender through misstatements to move business to a different insurer is twisting under O.C.G.A. § 33-6-4(b)(2), not churning.
  • B) Falsely attacking a rival insurer's financial condition is defamation under O.C.G.A. § 33-6-4(b)(3).
  • C) Offering premium rebates is rebating under O.C.G.A. § 33-6-4(b)(8)(B), a separate unfair practice.

Memory hook

Same insurer + cash value purchases = churning; different insurer + lies = twisting.

Related Practice Questions