PassSprint
State RegulationsFL specificDifficulty 2/5

A Florida agent recommends a long-term annuity with heavy surrender charges to a retiree who says she needs access to her money soon for medical expenses. Why is this recommendation problematic?

Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.

Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)

Why C is correct

Under Chapter 627, Florida Statutes, annuity suitability rules enforced by the DFS require reasonable grounds to believe a recommendation serves the consumer's best interest in light of her financial situation, needs, and objectives. A retiree who states she needs short-term access to funds for medical expenses has effectively told the agent the product is wrong for her; pressing a long surrender-charge annuity is unsuitable.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A) Age alone never makes an annuity sale illegal; suitability turns on the consumer's needs and objectives.
  • B) A signed disclosure form cannot cure a recommendation that is unsuitable on its face.
  • D) The issuer being authorized says nothing about whether this product fits this consumer's liquidity needs.

Memory hook

Listen first, sell second: needs drive suitability.

Related Practice Questions