PassSprint

One rule, 2 ways the exam asks it. Same knowledge point, different phrasing — work through all of them, because the exam rarely reuses the wording.

State RegulationsCO specificDifficulty 2/5

A business owner in Aurora asks licensed producer Ryan Tallow to place its employee benefit plan with an insurer that holds no Colorado license from the Division of Insurance. What should Ryan do?

Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.

Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)

Why B is correct

C.R.S. 10-3-903 and the related unauthorized-entity provisions continuing through 10-3-904.5 prohibit transacting insurance in Colorado without Division of Insurance authority. A producer who places business with an unauthorized entity participates in unlawful activity; the placement must not be made, and the Division is the body that determines whether an entity is authorized to transact insurance.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A) Out-of-state licensure does not authorize an insurer to transact business in Colorado; Division of Insurance authorization is required.
  • C) A private waiver cannot cure the lack of statutory authority; the prohibition is imposed by statute, not by contract.
  • D) Reporting after the fact does not authorize the placement; the transaction itself with an unauthorized entity is prohibited.

Memory hook

No Colorado license, no Colorado sale - check Division authority first.

State RegulationsCO specificDifficulty 2/5

A Colorado resident who owns commercial property asks a licensed producer to obtain coverage from an insurer that is not authorized to do business in Colorado. How does Colorado law treat this transaction?

Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.

Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)

Why B is correct

Under part 9 of article 3 of title 10, including C.R.S. § 10-3-903, insurance business in Colorado may be transacted only by entities authorized by the Colorado Division of Insurance through properly licensed producers. Placing coverage with an unauthorized entity is a prohibited transaction and exposes both the entity and the producer to enforcement action by the Division, regardless of any waiver the insured might sign.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A) An insured's waiver cannot cure a violation of the unauthorized-entity prohibitions; the statute protects the regulatory system, not just the individual insured.
  • C) Direct payment of premium does not legalize the transaction; the prohibition reaches the placement itself, not merely the flow of money.
  • D) Colorado draws no commercial-versus-personal exception to the requirement that insurance be transacted through authorized entities.

Memory hook

No Colorado license, no Colorado sale — waivers and wire transfers change nothing.

Related Practice Questions