PassSprint
State RegulationsCO specificDifficulty 3/5

A Colorado small-group carrier proposes a higher renewal rate for a Boulder employer specifically because the group's claims experience was high during the prior year. Under Colorado small-employer rating law, is this permitted?

Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.

Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)

Why A is correct

Colorado small-employer rating under C.R.S. § 10-16-105.6 limits the factors a carrier may use to develop small-group rates. Rating a group up or down because of its claims experience or health status is not a permitted factor, so an experience-driven renewal increase violates the rating framework even if the employer is notified or consents.

Why the other options are wrong

  • B) Notice does not cure an impermissible rating basis; the problem is the factor used, not the timing of the notice.
  • C) Employer consent cannot transform a prohibited experience-based factor into a lawful one.
  • D) The increase is prohibited because claims experience is not a permitted rating factor, not because employer approval is missing.

Memory hook

Small-group rates ride on approved factors — never on the group's own claims.

Related Practice Questions