PassSprint
State RegulationsCO specificDifficulty 2/5

A Colorado Springs insurer declines an applicant solely because another insurer refused or canceled his coverage the previous year. Under Colorado law, this refusal is:

Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.

Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)

Why C is correct

C.R.S. § 10-3-1104(1)(f) prohibits refusing a person solely because another insurer previously refused, canceled, or did not renew that person's coverage. Each Colorado insurer must evaluate an applicant on the merits; a competitor's earlier decision is not a lawful basis by itself.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A) Prior refusal by another carrier is not a merits-based underwriting ground; the statute makes it discriminatory when used as the sole reason.
  • B) Documentation of the earlier insurer's reasons does not transform a prohibited basis into a lawful one.
  • D) No Division notice converts the conduct; the refusal is prohibited regardless of any reporting step.

Memory hook

Another carrier's 'no' cannot be your 'no' (§ 10-3-1104(1)(f)).

Related Practice Questions