PassSprint
State RegulationsAZ specificDifficulty 2/5

A Tucson insurer learns that a long-term policyholder obtained a protective order after domestic abuse and moves to non-renew the policy solely because of that status. Under A.R.S. 20-448, how is this treated?

Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.

Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)

Why C is correct

A.R.S. 20-448 extends Arizona's unfair discrimination protections to a person's status as a victim of domestic abuse, so an underwriting action based solely on that status is a prohibited practice and subjects the insurer to discipline by the Director.

Why the other options are wrong

  • A) Speculation about risk does not excuse discrimination based on domestic-abuse status under A.R.S. 20-448.
  • B) Notice does not cure a practice that is itself prohibited by A.R.S. 20-448.
  • D) The prohibition operates directly under A.R.S. 20-448; its application does not depend on a consumer complaint.

Memory hook

Victim status is protected status — no non-renewals over abuse history.

Related Practice Questions