A client wants lifetime coverage at the lowest possible level premium and is willing to accept little or no cash value accumulation. Which product best fits this need?
Select an option to reveal the answer and the full 3-part explanation — free, no signup.
Answer & full 3-part explanation (select an option above, or peek)
Why A is correct
Guaranteed universal life (GUL) is a form of universal life designed to provide level, guaranteed lifetime protection at premiums significantly lower than whole life while accumulating little cash value. The policy stays in force as long as the scheduled premium is paid, typically backed by a no-lapse or secondary guarantee provision. It appeals to clients whose primary goal is permanent death protection rather than savings or cash value growth, effectively delivering a term-like premium for lifetime coverage. Because the guaranteed premium is level for life, GUL is often compared with whole life and term when an advisor must match the client's protection needs to the lowest lifetime cost.
Why the other options are wrong
- B) Variable universal life emphasizes investment in subaccounts with market risk and cash value growth; it does not offer the lowest premium and adds securities regulation. GUL is not chosen for market-driven growth, so this alternative misses the client's stated goal of minimal cash value.
- C) Indexed universal life credits interest based on an equity index and builds cash value; it costs more and is chosen for growth potential, not minimal cash value. Its equity-indexed crediting builds account value and carries a higher cost than a no-cash-value GUL.
- D) Whole life guarantees level premiums and death benefits but builds a significant guaranteed cash value, so its premium is higher than GUL. The guaranteed cash value in whole life is exactly what pushes its premium above a GUL premium.
Memory hook
GUL = lifetime coverage at near-term price, cash value kept to a whisper.